Three Great Fall Hikes Near Denver

When fall begins to roll in, it means that hiking season is quickly coming to a close. With a beautiful weather forecast for the weekend, now’s the time to get in one last good hike for the season. Here are three parks close to town (but far enough away to feel away from it all) that could be on your list this fall.

Matthews/Winters Park
Difficulty: Moderate
Cost: Free

Matthews/Winters Park
Matthews/Winters Park gives one of the best views of Denver’s “Hogback” and Ken Caryl Valley.

Located right next door to the famous Red Rocks amphitheater just west of town, this hike features a walk past a historic cemetery and hike up a ridge with a beautiful view of all Denver and Red Rocks itself. A common path is a loop that runs over the Village Walk Trail, up the switchback on Cherry Gulch Trail to the top of the ridge, and Red Rocks Trail AWAY from Red Rocks, which leads back to the Cherry Gulch/Village Walk intersection. The switchback section of the trail is a bit rough, but the view is worth it.

This is a great trail to take if you want to fit a hike and Red Rocks into the same day. You can visit Red Rocks and then take a hike, or you can actually hike from the Matthews/Winters parking lot all the way to Red Rocks, though you’re looking at a much longer hike if you decide to go that route.

Roxborough State Park
Difficulty: Variable
Cost: Park Entrance Fee (< $10, see website for more information)

Roxborough State Park is a jewel of the Denver area, offering views of red rock formations and scenic hikes without going too far from home.
Roxborough State Park is a jewel of the Denver area, offering views of red rock formations and scenic hikes without going too far from home.

This is one of the most beautiful places around Denver, bar none. It may be a bit late to catch all the fall colors, but this place absolutely glows with color this time of year if you can catch any of it. Apart from that, Roxborough has a host of trail options that make it really easy to control your difficulty and mileage. Tougher trails include the hike up Carpenter’s Peak, a moderate to steep switchback trail with a summit height of 7,160 feet.

Cottonwood Canyon
Difficulty: Easy/Moderate
Cost: Park Entrance Fee (< $10, see website for more information)

Cottonwood Canyon
Cottonwood Canyon offers a choice between hiking the canyon rim or floor, literal flocks of birds of prey, and historically significant sites.

Cottonwood Canyon is a beautiful hike through a river gorge and canyon, with the option to get up on top of the canyon itself, past a crumbled, out-of-use dam that was one of the first in the state. I often see birds of prey hanging out above the canyon, playing in the wind currents. The hike through the canyon can get more chilly than the rest, so make sure you pack a warm, long sleeve shirt for that particular section.

Others to Consider

Cherry Creek State Park – Located very, very close to our office, this state park is part reservoir, part flat hiking trails. Great for a quick getaway.

Golden Gate Canyon – More of a mountainy feel, but still with great views of the Denver/Boulder area.

Mt. Falcon Park – A beautiful hike in the pine trees with several sites of historic significance. One of the big draws, apart from the scenery and wildlife, is the cornerstone for the “Summer White House.” This was laid here, and although construction never continued, you can still visit the cornerstone and learn more about the site’s history.

Meyer Ranch Park – A moderate hike through the pines west of Denver. This hike is all about experiencing the forest and wildlife, and has an excellent payoff at the end. Moderate difficulty.

Deer Creek Canyon – One of the best “mountain-y” hikes for its proximity to the city.

Hayden Park on Green Mountain – Completely exposed, but moderate difficulty and the best direct view of the city in the metro area.

One of the Most Beautifully Designed Video Games of All Time is Getting a Sequel

I have a confession to make.  I didn’t grow up with video games.

It wasn’t until I was in my 20’s and on my own that I got my first console, a PlayStation 2 that I paid $50 for nearly 6 years after it was released.  In 2011, I bought an X-Box 360, also six years after it was released.

There are some drawbacks to being a console (and more than a half decade) behind the cutting edge of video gaming.  Avoiding spoilers for that length of time is tough, especially working in an industry where the nerdy stuff is a daily topic of conversation.

But if you can stomach not “keeping up with the Johnsons,” being six years behind is an amazing blessing.  There are hundreds of titles available for your “new” console the moment you purchase it.  All of the bugs that are fixable have been fixed.  Each last in-game feature morsel of DLC is available, with both main title and pay-to-play content often available at steep discounts.

When I picked up my X-Box 360 in December 2011, I decided to pick up the then year-and-a-half-old Red Dead Redemption at the same time.  I had been a big fan of Rockstar Games since Vice City (which, though it came out in 2002, I only managed to sink my teeth into four years after it was released).  I figured Red Dead would be the GTA in the desert.

I was wrong.  It was so much more.

To this day, Red Dead Redemption is the single most beautiful and addicting video game I’ve ever played.

Perhaps the most telling argument for the game’s intrinsic beauty and playability is the ability to get John Marston on his horse and simply ride around the map for hours, rescuing damsels in distress, hunting buffalo, dueling with Mexican bandits, and watching the amazing landscape ebb, flow, and change around him, without once completing a single mission in the main story line.

It took me years to complete the main story line, simply because most days I played, all I wanted to do was saddle up and ride.

Today Rockstar announced a sequel to this gem of the video game landscape.  Red Dead Redemption 2 is due out in October 2017, with its first trailer appearing on Thursday.

There has not ever been a video game title that’s pushed me to spend the kind of money that the “next gen” consoles demand.  Though I’m a huge NFL fan, I’ll keep updating my Madden 15 rosters and re-playing with old graphics and physics.  Ditto with FIFA 15.  I’m three titles behind in Gears of War, so GoW4 holds little interest for me.  Destiny is not my destiny.

Red Dead 2 is.

Come October 2017, I will have my next-gen console.  And if Rockstar lives up to the hype and promise that it’s shown within its capabilities, I’ll have a new favorite video game as well.

When are Ageless, Genderless User Personas Effective?

On the web, everyone is equal.

This is a problem, especially for those of us engaged in the business of writing user personas.

It should be no secret by this point that the how-to of creating user personas is still up in the air.  There is a modicum of agreement that personas should be based around the analytics gathered on the website in question.  How treat data in comparison and contrasts with your target audience, and how to synthesize that comparison into user personas, is still widely up for debate.

So where do we start when it comes to building user personas?

One of the most helpful resources I point newcomers to is usability.gov, which has a list of some great user persona standards. Among other things, they suggest you provide a persona with an age and gender.

This is a tricky bit, however.  There are many who want to treat everyone in all walks of life with equality, including some industry leaders that believe in removing age and gender from personas. The argument they provide is that these facets of a user don’t provide relevant context, and only add biased, unproven assumptions to the equations. Personas, they state, should be based on story archs, and not on aspects of the user that provide useless context to that story.

On a certain level, that makes sense.  We all make assumptions about people of different gender and ages based on our own experiences and the influence of the different people and institutions in our lives.  We’ve probably all heard that women are terrible drivers, or that teenagers don’t care about the world around them.  In general, we’re fighting a battle against the stereotypes we as individuals and as a culture use to label these groups.

This extension of ethnocentrism is the antitheses of what the world wide web is all about– providing the same opportunities to explore, learn, and consume to individuals the world over.

There are others (myself included) that believe the usefulness of a persona is at least two-fold. A persona allows you to synthesize data captured from analytics into usable format, true.  They also allow for designers to design for actual human beings rather than the generalized “user” that is so often discussed around the conference table.

By putting a face and name with a set of requirements, you’re suddenly working to make Susie Shopper’s experience better, not some nameless, faceless, un-relatable “user.”  Your work is more personal. You feel like you’re connecting with and solving the problems of actual customers.

Removing aspects such as age and gender only serve to de-personify the persona, which seems a bit of a contradiction of terms.  So long as we’re aware of our own presuppositions and actively seek to counter them, there’s no problem with keeping age and gender as part of our user personas.

But that’s not the only issue I have with this approach.

But wait! There's more!
But wait! There’s more!

The difficulty we run into here is the age old “ideal vs reality” conundrum.

I absolutely agree that men and women should be treated as equals.  Everyone, regardless of age, should have the same fair treatment when it comes to their web experiences.

However, the fact of the matter is that there is a good deal of difference to how men, women, and different age groups consume user interfaces and experiences.

According to a study conducted by the Worcester Polytechnic Institute,  women notice and use different aspects of a UI than men. Women, for instance, are more prone to notice people and faces, whereas men are more drawn to dynamic color choices. There’s also empirical evidence that things such as font choice may have a large effect on how men and women consume user interfaces.

The study on font consumption in UI dealt specifically with cars, but has far-reaching implications.
The study on font consumption in UI dealt specifically with cars, but has far-reaching implications.

Additionally, the age range of your demographic should affect your UX design, especially if you’re designing for older audiences. There’s a significant amount of research and knowledge behind understanding how older adults interact with the web.  Things like font choice and size, which you might expect has a larger impact for older audiences, actually have negligible effects on usability for older adults, while persistent and consistent navigation have a huge benefit.

While it may be politically correct to have the concept that “women are no different from men,” and that “age doesn’t matter,” the reality of the situation, when it comes to UX at least, is that there’s a distinct difference between the groups.  How this difference is applied will vary depending on you site’s demographics and target audience.

If your site is age and gender agnostic, then by all means, go ahead and strip out this information.  If not, ensure that your user persona, as well as your assumptions about that user, are based on a solid scientific grounding, and not your stereotypical presuppositions.

As UX professionals, it’s our duty to provide everyone an equally effective and awesome experience, tailored to our users’ collective needs and wants.

Afer all, on the web, everyone is equal.

User Interface vs. User Experience: Sliding Into the Differences

You’ve been thinking about a career in the emerging field of User Experience, and as you read through job listings and requirements, a questions hits you.  What is the difference between a User Experience Engineer and a User Interface Designer?

You’ve hit one of the core problems with this emerging career field. I would say most people don’t know or fully understand what UX is. Many employers have heard UX as a buzzword, and are just beginning to recognize UX as an important aspect of the design and development process. As a result, UX is often confused with UI, and many people taking on UX roles end up doing more UI work than anything else.

The infinite wisdom of Inigo Montoya extends to the world of User Experience.
The infinite wisdom of Inigo Montoya extends to the world of User Experience.

So what is the difference between the two?

The basic answer I go with is “User Interface is the controls you use when working with a website/piece of software/etc. User Experience is how you feel about using those controls.”

My favorite way to explain what UX is, and where it fits in the process is to imagine a building that constantly has so many people on the top floor and coming up the staircase that it’s difficult, if not impossible, for anyone to use the stairs to go back down again. It’s a huge problem, and the fire marshall is threatening to close down all access unless a way to get people off the top floor is installed soon. An interior design consultant is brought in, and has quite a few different options to select from that might get people from the top to bottom floors: stairs, elevators, bungee cords, a sheer drop with a big inflatable cushion at the bottom, etc. After some consideration, the consultant might come up with the idea of a slide being the most efficient way to get from top to bottom floors.

Who knew a beautiful view could be a major fire hazard?
Who knew a beautiful view could be a major fire hazard?

To get as many people off the top floor of the building, it will need to be as close to the best possible slide for its particular use. Now the building’s architect has some work to do. Where does the slide go? In the corner, in the middle of the floor, by the biggest window, or even starting at the window, leading outside the building?

This was either a terrible or an awesome idea.
This was either a terrible or an awesome idea.

The architect will likely base their decision by coordinating with a number of different individuals and groups. The architect might need to review with the building owner about where to put the slide so that it doesn’t interfere with using space on the bottom floor. The architect might also have a conversation with people on the top floor of the building about how they’d feel about different slides in different places in the building. The architect will likely do some reading to see if any other building are using slides to get people from floor to floor, and what’s making those slides successful. They may even visit a building down the street with a slide of its own to experience for themselves what they like or don’t like about that slide (competitive product research).

Who says research can't be fun?
Who says research can’t be fun?

Once they have all of the information they need to make the final decision about where to put the slide, they’ll probably work with the interior design consultant to make sure that the color and sizing of the slide work with the existing color scheme in both the top and bottom floors.

By the time the construction crew is on-site and ready to build the slide, the architect will have blueprints and specific instructions for the construction team on how the slide should be constructed.  The architect may need to be available to answer questions about the slide’s construction and materials.

The architect will also need to test the slide, however, both before and after it’s in use to answer a number of different real-world questions.  Is the slide dangerous to use?   Is it as fun and efficient as the architect expected?  Do people use it as expected, or are people attempting to scramble up the slide to get to the second floor?  Depending on the results of the testing, the architect may need to tweak the design slightly (or perhaps even scrap and remove the slide if it doesn’t work well at all).

My work here is done.
My work here is done.

We can extend this metaphor to actual web product development. The interior design consultant is a UI designer: it’s their job to understand the different options about what different elements are available for any particular situation (in this case, choosing between another staircase, a the big cushion at the bottom of a sheer drop, or a slide) and to make initial recommendations on the controller.

The UX engineer is the architect, doing the research on the chosen controller and deciding best location for that controller in context of the current project (the house itself), giving the basic instructions for implementation, and then testing the product both during its development and after it’s finished to make sure it’s reaching the needs of real-world users.

Additionally, the architect and interior designer collaborate at different points in the project, just as UI and UX teams might interact. There may even be some crossover between the two functions, but in the end, there is a distinct line where the UI designer’s work ends and the UX engineer’s work begins.

With all of this in mind, it’s easy to see how UX and UI get mixed and confused with one another. Hopefully I’ve built a good description of how these two vital functions differ from one another.

Pun totally intended.

When Worlds Collide: My Cup of Tea (of a Kind)

It’s not often that my love of good food and drink intersects with engaging and fun user experience and interfaces.  An exception to this rule is the relatively-new (at least to the Denver area) Tea of a Kind, which is a tea unlike any other I’ve yet experienced.

When you find Tea of a Kind (hereafter abbreviated as “ToaK” because I’m just that lazy) on store shelves, it looks something like an eco-friendly, bottle of purified water.  This is hardly surprising, as, at this point in its life, that’s all it really is.

But do you see notice the weird looking cap?  It’s the secret to ToaK’s success.

This weird little gizmo is called, fittingly, a Gizmo.
This weird little gizmo is called, fittingly, a Gizmo.

In a moment, this little cap, which ToaK has termed a “Gizmo,” transforms the contents of the fresh little bottle of water into even more refreshing tea.

If you can’t make out Marty McFly’s jawline, it’s only because it’s on the floor.

Seriously, how cool is that?

What’s more, not only does this little Gizmo provide the single best physical UX element of any drink I’ve yet encountered, ToaK maintains that it “prevents degradation of key ingredients” such as vitamins, antioxidants, and other key functional ingredients.

Now, let’s be frank for a moment.  Is ToaK any better tasting than other tea brands out there?  I’ve sampled the unsweetened black and peach ginger varieties and I’ve come to the conclusion of “not particularly.”  ToaK may be marginally more fresh, but compared to its competitors its flavor is average.

The reason I pick one of these up every. damn. time. I’m at the one convenience store in the Denver area I’ve been able to find them is because of just how cool the user experience is.  I don’t care that it’s supposedly fresher, or that the bottle looks cool, or even that it’s slightly more expensive that a majority of its competitors.  I’ll buy it just to show it off the fantastic experience of watching tea brewed instantaneously before my eyes.

Kudos, Tea of a Kind.  Until someone else comes up with something similar and more delicious, you’ve made a loyal customer (and fan) out of me.

 

Hitting a Home Run in DC

2016-06-26-14.10.37.jpg.jpg

For the first part of this week I’m traveling out to DC to visit my wife, who’s spending her summer months in an internship at the Smithsonian. Yesterday we went to visit the National Portrait Gallery (a wonderful experience in itself), and visited a small exhibit dedicated to Babe Ruth.  Being baseball fans ourselves, we couldn’t help but take a gander.

Not only did they include some wonderful portraits of the Babe throughout his career, but pictured very predominantly was an autographed Babe Ruth baseball and game-used bat.

20160626_141237.jpg

For two people who were just strolling through a building of national treasures in a building full of priceless artwork, it was a bit of a surreal experience to stumble across one of the Holy Grails of the sports memorabilia world.  I’ve never before seen an actual Babe Ruth autograph, and never expect to again.

The Best Illustration of UI vs. UX

To those that wonder exactly what it is that I do everyday, this is a pretty succinct way of explaining what us UX people do.

Other people suggest the need for a slide. I suggest where to put it, what it should be made out of, where it should take you, and how you should feel when you use it (awesome, hopefully).

You can read more about the Sky Slide in LA here.